16. Three Facts and subtleties of Evil vs Good communication

Thereafter I had three 'facts' to contend with the identity of these technological agents of disease.

First the agent of disease acted in an arbitrary way against all of my world, my dominion.  Whether Human, animal, plant, mineral or any other thing of my world, all were under one form of attack or another.  All of these attacks were not identical, and were unified only by their general tactical purpose to depress the intellect and spiritual potency of our own dominion of being.

Second such technological applications of the multiverse had been used to manipulate the religious,political and scientific interpretations of the real world and the multiverse all throughout history.

Third such technological applications had been accompanied by the will to impersonate familiar characteristics and appearances of peoples and historical figures in order to effect these manipulations.

Yet from some sense or memory, I had the strongest feeling that the forces of evil, the agents of disease were not the only inhabitants of the multiverse.  I had since taken the due pinch of salt required to allow me to relegate my own wondrous religious experience potentially to the mere co-incidence of repetition and re-iteration of significant phrases and sayings in the Bible.   However I was still overwhelmed by the sense that the evil of the obviously morally fallen was not the only force of the multiverse producing the sincerity of its political design toward my communication of truth and fact.  That good party revolved to me around the will to make mankind strong by the effort to communicate resurrection generating behaviour to my world.   It always seemed so difficult though to try to differentiate that 'Godly' communication from my own deductive reasoning.  That is compared to the obvious psychological annoyance of auditory hallucination I knew was the activity of an evil insidious force.   So I try to stick to the line of deductive reasoning that occurred.  I presume that the reason was that if there was a separate channel of divine communication that it had so much in common with my own natural political interest that it was very hard to say where that communication was separate to my own pleasure in any particular thought.